Kinshasa or Taipei: which is better?
World city: head-to-head comparison
Kinshasa wins on more indicators: 1 of 1 against 0.
- Climate and risks: Kinshasa 1:0
All indicators weigh the same. This is a score based on data, not advice on where to live: different people have different circumstances.
Kinshasa
Indicator
Taipei
Population
no winnerCity population
neutral indicator: higher does not mean better
7,785,965 people
GeoNames snapshot (all-the-cities 3.1.0 package, 2022), exact date not stated
7,871,900 people
GeoNames snapshot (all-the-cities 3.1.0 package, 2022), exact date not stated
Urban centre population
neutral indicator: higher does not mean better
12,945,683 people
2025
9,686,521 people
2025
Urban centre area
neutral indicator: higher does not mean better
487 km²
2025
972 km²
2025
Urban centre density
neutral indicator: higher does not mean better
26,583 people per km²
2025
9,966 people per km²
2025
Urban centre population growth, 2015–2025
neutral indicator: higher does not mean better
66.4 %
2015–2025
9.2 %
2015–2025
Climate and risks
Better: Kinshasa (1 : 0)Daylight on December 21
neutral indicator: higher does not mean better
12.4 hours
December 21 and June 21 (does not depend on the year)
10.6 hours
December 21 and June 21 (does not depend on the year)
Daylight on June 21
neutral indicator: higher does not mean better
11.9 hours
December 21 and June 21 (does not depend on the year)
13.7 hours
December 21 and June 21 (does not depend on the year)
Distance to the sea
neutral indicator: higher does not mean better
302 km
2006-2025
21 km
2006-2025
Earthquakes M4.5+ within 100 km
lower is better
✓0.00 per year
2006-2025
✗9.90 per year
2006-2025
Strongest earthquake in the period
no data for one of the places
no data
6.6 magnitude
2006-2025
A winner is named only for indicators with a known “better / worse” direction. Population and other neutral indicators are shown without a winner. Outdated and missing values are not counted. Details for each place: Kinshasa, Taipei.